Which statement about RAML to OpenAPI conversion is mentioned as a capability?

Which statement about RAML to OpenAPI conversion is mentioned as a capability?

• A. It can be done automatically by MuleSoft; full conversion will be available in the new release
• B. It requires manual rewriting in OpenAPI
• C. It is not supported in MuleSoft
• D. It can only be done via external tools

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is that MuleSoft provides an automatic way to convert RAML definitions into OpenAPI, with the expectation that full conversion support will be delivered in a forthcoming release. This means you can move from RAML to OpenAPI without rewriting everything by hand, which is a big time-saver when aligning API specs with tools and ecosystems that prefer OpenAPI. The statement reflects built-in capability and a planned enhancement in a future release, emphasizing interoperability between the two specification formats. The other options describe approaches that don’t align with what MuleSoft has announced—manual rewriting, no support, or reliance solely on external tools—so they don’t fit the described capability.

The main idea here is that MuleSoft provides an automatic way to convert RAML definitions into OpenAPI, with the expectation that full conversion support will be delivered in a forthcoming release. This means you can move from RAML to OpenAPI without rewriting everything by hand, which is a big time-saver when aligning API specs with tools and ecosystems that prefer OpenAPI. The statement reflects built-in capability and a planned enhancement in a future release, emphasizing interoperability between the two specification formats. The other options describe approaches that don’t align with what MuleSoft has announced—manual rewriting, no support, or reliance solely on external tools—so they don’t fit the described capability.